Archival & Legal Record · thestatepapers.com🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources · Treaty Texts

Treaties, Archives & Strategic Affairs

The State Papers

Primary sources, treaties and Türkiye's view on world affairs

In-Depth Analysis· Türkiye marine spatial planning IOC-UNESCO 2025

Türkiye's Marine Spatial Planning and the 2025 IOC-UNESCO Registration: What It Means

Türkiye's Marine Spatial Planning was registered with IOC-UNESCO on 12 June 2025. See what it covers, why it matters and how Greece and the EU view it.

TSP
Published:
⏱ 10 min read (2,080 words)

Why It Matters

Türkiye's Marine Spatial Planning is a national plan that maps how its seas are used and which areas it regards as under its jurisdiction in the Black Sea, the Aegean and the Mediterranean. It was unveiled on 16 April 2025 and registered with the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO (IOC-UNESCO) on 12 June 2025. Ankara presents this as the first time its maritime position has been recorded with a UN body. Critics, including Greece, the Greek Cypriot administration and EU institutions, say that a planning registration cannot settle disputed boundaries. Both points are needed to read the plan accurately.

Background

What marine spatial planning is

Marine spatial planning (MSP) is a public process that analyses and allocates human activities in sea areas, for ecological, economic and social goals. Typical uses include shipping lanes, fisheries, offshore energy, cables and pipelines, tourism, defence zones and conservation areas. IOC-UNESCO promotes MSP globally through its MSPglobal programme, and many coastal states publish national plans. The European Union requires its member states to adopt maritime spatial plans under Directive 2014/89/EU. Practice varies by country, but a plan normally records a state's own view of the waters under its authority. It does not by itself create or change a maritime boundary.

Türkiye has about 870 km (roughly 540 miles) of coastline in the Eastern Mediterranean, which Ankara describes as the longest continental coastline in that sea. The Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean contain no agreed continental shelf or exclusive economic zone (EEZ) boundaries between Türkiye and Greece, or between Türkiye and the Republic of Cyprus. Türkiye is not a party to the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), while Greece and Cyprus are. This is the main reason the two sides use different legal frameworks.

Key dates

Date Event
2004 Türkiye begins filing its Eastern Mediterranean continental shelf coordinates with the UN
2009 and 2012 TPAO, the Turkish state petroleum company, receives exploration licences
21 September 2011 Türkiye and the TRNC sign a Continental Shelf Delimitation Agreement
27 November 2019 Türkiye and Libya sign a maritime jurisdiction delimitation memorandum
18 March 2020 Türkiye registers the outer limits of its continental shelf with the UN
16 April 2025 'Marine Spatial Planning of the Republic of Türkiye' is unveiled
12 June 2025 The plan is registered and recorded with IOC-UNESCO
24 July 2025 A Presidential Circular creates an Inter-Agency Coordination Board under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

For the wider legal picture, see Eastern Mediterranean and Blue Homeland: Türkiye's Maritime Jurisdiction Explained.

What the 2025 plan covers

According to Turkish official announcements, the plan covers all three of Türkiye's seas: the Black Sea, the Aegean Sea and the Mediterranean. It sets out the country's maritime areas and the use of those areas for activities such as energy, shipping, fisheries and conservation. It also introduced a Marine Protected Area off Finike on the Mediterranean coast, which gives the plan an environmental dimension alongside the jurisdictional one. The Presidential Circular of 24 July 2025 then set up an Inter-Agency Coordination Board, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as its secretariat, to coordinate implementation across ministries.

Key Players & Positions

IOC-UNESCO

IOC-UNESCO is the UN system's body for ocean science and observation. It coordinates MSP guidance and accepts national planning documents as part of its programme. It is a technical and scientific organisation. It does not rule on sovereignty, validate maritime claims or delimit boundaries, and no one should read the registration as a judgment on any dispute.

Greece

Greece relies on UNCLOS and argues that islands generate maritime zones, including continental shelf and EEZ, in the same way as other land territory. Greek officials have rejected Turkish maps that they say ignore the maritime entitlements of Greek islands, and they say that national planning documents cannot create legal effects against a third state. Athens has also completed its own national maritime spatial planning process and has proposed taking the continental shelf and EEZ question to the International Court of Justice, limited to that single issue. Readers should check the Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs for its current wording.

The Greek Cypriot administration

The Republic of Cyprus, which Türkiye calls the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus (GCASC), has declared an EEZ and signed delimitation agreements with Egypt (2003), Lebanon (2007) and Israel (2010). It says it acts as a sovereign state under UNCLOS in managing the resources of its EEZ. It rejects Turkish claims that overlap with its licensed blocks and treats Turkish exploration in them as a violation of its sovereign rights.

The European Union

EU institutions, through European Council conclusions and statements by the Commission and the European External Action Service, have repeatedly expressed solidarity with Greece and Cyprus. They have said that the Türkiye–Libya memorandum infringes the sovereign rights of third states and does not comply with the law of the sea. The EU's position is that maritime disputes should be resolved through dialogue and, where necessary, international adjudication, based on international law and UNCLOS. The EU considers UNCLOS to reflect customary international law.

The TRNC and Libya

The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), recognised only by Türkiye, supports Ankara's position and claims equal rights over resources around the island. Libya's Tripoli-based government, which signed the 2019 memorandum with Türkiye, treats it as valid. Other Libyan authorities have contested it.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources · Treaty Texts

Türkiye's Position

  • Equity governs delimitation. According to the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, maritime boundaries in semi-enclosed seas such as the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean must be drawn by agreement on the basis of equity, taking account of relevant circumstances such as coastal geography and proportionality. Ankara argues that small islands near a mainland coast should not cut off the maritime projection of a country with the longest coastline in the area. This follows the equity-based approach reflected in the case law of the International Court of Justice and arbitral tribunals on continental shelf delimitation. Türkiye is not a party to UNCLOS and has long said that it is not bound by provisions it did not accept.
  • The plan records Türkiye's position in a UN forum. Turkish officials say that registering the plan with IOC-UNESCO on 12 June 2025 placed Türkiye's maritime jurisdiction position across the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean on record with a UN body for the first time. They say it complements the continental shelf coordinates submitted to the UN in 2004 and the outer limits registered on 18 March 2020.
  • Turkish Cypriots hold equal rights. The Presidency and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs say that the Turkish Cypriots, as co-founders of the 1960 Republic of Cyprus, have equal and inherent rights to the island's offshore resources. They argue that no hydrocarbon activity should proceed without their participation. The Türkiye–TRNC Continental Shelf Delimitation Agreement of 21 September 2011 and the TRNC's revenue-sharing proposals of 2011, 2012 and 2019 reflect this view. See The Cyprus Issue: From the 1960 Treaties to the Sovereign Equal Two-State Solution.
  • Maximalist maps and EU competence are rejected. Ankara rejects the so-called 'Seville Map', which Greece and the Greek Cypriot side have backed and which would confine Türkiye's jurisdiction to a narrow strip in the Gulf of Antalya. It says the EU has no competence to adjudicate maritime boundaries between third states and that 'Union solidarity' cannot replace delimitation under international law.
  • Dialogue stays on offer. President Erdoğan's 2020 proposal for an Eastern Mediterranean Conference, open to all coastal states including the Turkish Cypriots, remains the central Turkish diplomatic offer. Türkiye says its drilling fleet (the Fatih, Yavuz, Kanuni and Abdülhamid Han drillships and the seismic vessels Oruç Reis and Barbaros Hayreddin Paşa) exercises its rights in licensed areas. The Inter-Agency Coordination Board under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is meant to give this policy a single institutional structure.

These points are Ankara's stated policy as expressed by Turkish primary sources. The other parties dispute several of them, as the previous section shows.

Source Comparison

The same facts are often presented with very different emphasis. The table below summarises the contrasts. It is a description of framing and not a ruling on the law.

Question Turkish primary sources Greek, Greek Cypriot and EU sources
What does registration with IOC-UNESCO mean? A first-time UN-level record of Türkiye's maritime position in all three seas A technical filing of a national planning document, with no legal effect on boundaries
Which legal rules apply? Equity and relevant circumstances; Türkiye is not an UNCLOS party UNCLOS, including the island entitlement rules, regarded as customary law
Role of islands Should not cut off the projection of a mainland with the longest coastline Islands generate full maritime zones
Turkish Cypriot rights Equal co-owners of the island's offshore resources The Republic of Cyprus acts for the whole island as a UN and EU member
EU role No competence in third-party delimitation Solidarity with member states; calls for dialogue and, if needed, adjudication
Way forward Equitable agreement by negotiation, plus a regional conference Dialogue or referral to the ICJ on delimitation

Two observations help readers who follow the coverage. First, headlines that say Türkiye 'registered its maritime claims with the UN' compress a more complicated process. The registration was with IOC-UNESCO, a scientific body, as a spatial plan. Second, statements from the other side that the plan is 'legally irrelevant' are also positions, not findings by a court. Only an agreement between the states concerned or a ruling by a competent tribunal can fix a boundary. For method, see Editorial Principles: How The State Papers Separates Fact from Position, and for other contested claims see Fact Check: Common Claims About Türkiye in International Media, Tested Against Primary Sources.

  • Marine spatial planning (MSP): a public process that allocates sea areas to uses such as shipping, energy, fisheries and conservation. It is a management tool and does not itself delimit boundaries.
  • IOC-UNESCO: the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, the UN's ocean science body, which runs the MSPglobal programme.
  • Continental shelf and EEZ: the seabed and water-column zones in which a coastal state has sovereign rights over resources. Their delimitation between neighbours requires agreement or adjudication.
  • Principle of equity: the rule that a boundary should produce an equitable result considering coastal geography, proportionality and other relevant circumstances.
  • Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan): the Turkish doctrine that Türkiye has maritime jurisdiction rights in the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean based on its coastline and international law.
  • GCASC and TRNC: Türkiye's official terms for the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

Related guides:

The State Papers presents global affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources. Published by the The State Papers Editorial Team.

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

Frequently asked questions

What is Türkiye's Marine Spatial Planning?

It is the 'Marine Spatial Planning of the Republic of Türkiye', a national plan unveiled on 16 April 2025 that maps how the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean are used and managed. It covers areas of maritime jurisdiction and uses such as energy, shipping, fisheries and conservation. It was registered with IOC-UNESCO on 12 June 2025.

Does IOC-UNESCO registration settle Türkiye's maritime boundaries?

No. IOC-UNESCO is a scientific and technical body and does not delimit boundaries or rule on sovereignty. Ankara describes the registration as a UN-level record of its position, while Greece, Cyprus and the EU say it has no legal effect on disputed areas. Boundaries are fixed only by agreement between states or by a competent tribunal.

What is the Finike Marine Protected Area?

It is a protected marine area designated off Finike on Türkiye's Mediterranean coast as part of the 2025 planning framework. It gives the plan an environmental component alongside its jurisdictional one. Official Turkish announcements are the primary source for its exact boundaries and rules.

What did the Presidential Circular of 24 July 2025 do?

It established an Inter-Agency Coordination Board, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as its secretariat, to coordinate the implementation of the marine spatial plan across Turkish ministries and institutions. It provides an institutional structure for a policy that touches energy, transport, environment and foreign affairs.

How do Greece, Cyprus and the EU view the plan?

Greece and the Greek Cypriot administration argue that UNCLOS applies, that islands generate full maritime zones and that a national planning document cannot bind other states. EU institutions have expressed solidarity with both members and call for dialogue and, if needed, adjudication under international law.

Why does Türkiye not rely on UNCLOS?

Türkiye is not a party to the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and says it is not bound by provisions it has not accepted. It argues that equity and relevant circumstances, as reflected in international case law, should govern delimitation in semi-enclosed seas such as the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean.

Perspective & Editorial Transparency Note

The State Papers presents global and regional affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy and legal doctrines as stated by Turkish primary sources.

Author: The State Papers Editorial TeamAbout The State Papers →Editorial Principles →

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks