In-Depth Analysis· Turkish defense industry domestic production rate Bayraktar TB2 KAAN

Türkiye's Defense Industry: How It Reached 80% Domestic Production

How did the Turkish defense industry reach a roughly 80% domestic production rate? From Bayraktar TB2 to KAAN and TCG Anadolu: history, NATO role, limits.

TSP

By The State Papers Editorial Team

Published: October 26, 2026

⏱ 8 min read (1,693 words)

Executive Summary & Key Facts

Turkish officials say Türkiye's defense industry now meets roughly 80% of its needs domestically, up from about 20% in the early 2000s; this is an official project-level estimate, not an audited component count.
The modern drive for self-reliance was shaped by the US arms embargo of 1975–1978, the 2019 removal from the F-35 programme and the 2020 CAATSA sanctions on Türkiye's procurement agency.
Flagship programmes include the Bayraktar TB2 and Akıncı drones, the KAAN fifth-generation fighter, the TCG Anadolu amphibious assault ship and the ATMACA, SOM and HİSAR-O missile families.
Foreign-sourced engines, sensors and licensed designs remain in several systems, which is why independent analysts treat the 80% figure as a headline rate rather than a measure of full autonomy.
Ankara argues that predictable arms-export policy among NATO allies is part of collective defense, while critics in Europe and North America raise human-rights and end-use concerns about some exports.

Why It Matters

Türkiye's defense industry has moved from heavy dependence on imports to producing, according to Turkish officials, roughly 80% of its military requirements domestically. The shift came through embargo-driven policy, state-led procurement and a cluster of firms such as ASELSAN, ROKETSAN, Turkish Aerospace (TAI), Baykar, MKE and the Turkish shipyards. It matters because it changes the balance of NATO's defense-industrial base, creates a new arms exporter, and fuels debates over export controls and technology dependence among allies.

A caution on method: the 80% figure is an official estimate from Türkiye's Presidency of Defence Industries (SSB). It is not an independent audit, and it is usually calculated at programme level rather than component by component. For how this site separates verified fact from official position, see Editorial Principles: How The State Papers Separates Fact from Position.

Background

From Embargo to Strategy

The origins of Turkish defense self-reliance are usually traced to the mid-1970s. After the July 1974 Cyprus Peace Operation, the United States imposed an arms embargo on Türkiye that lasted from 1975 to 1978. Ankara has since cited this episode as proof that import dependence can be politicised. The legal basis of the 1974 operation is explained in The 1960 Treaty of Guarantee and Article IV.

Key institutional milestones:

1975: ASELSAN, now the leading defense electronics company, is founded by the Turkish Armed Forces Foundation.
1985: The defense industry development agency, later renamed, is created to coordinate procurement and localization.
1988: ROKETSAN is established to develop missiles and rockets.
2018: The procurement body is placed under the Presidency as the Presidency of Defence Industries (SSB), centralising decision-making.
2019: Türkiye is removed from the F-35 programme after acquiring the Russian S-400 air defense system.
2020: The United States applies CAATSA sanctions on SSB, a step Ankara rejected as inconsistent with allied relations.
2020–2022: Armed drones, especially the Bayraktar TB2, gain international attention in Libya, Nagorno-Karabakh and Ukraine.
2023–2024: TCG Anadolu enters service (April 2023), the Hürjet trainer flies (April 2023), and the KAAN fifth-generation fighter makes its first flight (February 2024).

The Main Systems

Category	Representative systems	Notes on dependence
UAV / UCAV	Bayraktar TB2, Akıncı, Aksungur, ANKA, Kızılelma	Early TB2s used a Western-made engine; several larger platforms used Ukrainian-origin engines, with indigenous alternatives in development
Aircraft	Hürjet, Hürkuş, T129 ATAK, KAAN	ATAK has an Italian-origin design lineage and a US-UK engine; early KAAN prototypes use US-made engines while a national engine is developed
Land	Fırtına howitzer, Kirpi, MEMATT demining vehicle	Fırtına was built under licence from the South Korean K9 design, with substantial local content
Naval	TCG Anadolu, MİLGEM corvettes and frigates, Reis-class submarines	Anadolu is based on a Spanish-designed hull concept; submarines are built under a German-origin design programme with growing local content
Missiles and air defense	SOM, ATMACA, Cirit, UMTAS, OMTAS, HİSAR-O, SİPER	Largely national designs; seekers and propulsion are increasingly local
Radar and electronic warfare	KORAL, MİLKED, MİLKAR, VURAL	Developed mainly by ASELSAN and national partners

This table shows why the headline rate and the technical reality can diverge: a system can be national in design, integration and software while still using foreign subcomponents.

Exports

Defense and aerospace exports have grown into the multi-billion-dollar range annually, according to Turkish industry and trade figures. Customers span Europe, Central Asia, Africa, the Gulf and Asia. Poland, Azerbaijan, Ukraine and several other states have operated Turkish drones. Exact contract values are often undisclosed, so treat published totals as indicative.

Key Players & Positions

Türkiye (SSB, Ministry of National Defence, Presidency). Ankara presents the sector as a strategic necessity and an alliance asset. Official statements stress local design authority, technology transfer to national firms and exports as a way to fund further research and development.

NATO. The Alliance does not rate national defense industries, but its capability targets rely on allies producing equipment at scale. At the June 2025 Hague summit, members endorsed a goal of 5% of GDP on defense-related spending (3.5% core defense, 1.5% related security investment). Türkiye, with one of the Alliance's largest armed forces, is positioned as both a producer and a customer within that expansion.

United States. Washington has linked Türkiye's S-400 purchase to the F-35 exclusion and CAATSA sanctions, arguing that Russian systems are incompatible with the F-35 and with NATO security. US officials have also continued some sales, including F-16 modernisation approvals in January 2024 after Sweden's accession to NATO was ratified by Ankara.

European states and the EU. Positions are divided. Several European governments restricted arms exports to Türkiye in October 2019 over the operation in northeast Syria, and some later eased restrictions. Under the EU's SAFE defense-financing instrument, third-country participation is subject to conditions, and the eligibility of Türkiye has been contested by members such as Greece and Cyprus. Other allies favour deeper defense-industrial cooperation with Ankara.

Greece and the Republic of Cyprus. Both governments voice concern that Turkish naval and air programmes may shift the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean balance. Turkish officials respond that these capabilities support maritime-jurisdiction and security needs; see Eastern Mediterranean and Blue Homeland.

Human-rights organisations and some parliaments. They call for strict end-use monitoring of arms and drone exports, citing the risk of misuse in conflicts. Türkiye states that it exports to recognised governments in line with its national legislation.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources · Treaty Texts

Türkiye's Position

Self-reliance is a security requirement. According to the Presidency of Defence Industries (SSB) and the Presidency, the target is to reduce external dependence so that operations are not constrained by foreign licensing decisions. Ankara cites the 1975–1978 embargo and later restrictions as the historical basis.
Production serves collective defense. The Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of National Defence describe national capacity as a contribution to NATO, noting Türkiye's long membership (since 1952). Ankara reads Article 3 of the 1949 Washington Treaty, which calls on allies to maintain and develop their capacity to resist armed attack, as supportive of strong allied industries.
Export controls should be predictable and non-political. Ankara argues that politically driven restrictions among allies on parts and licences, such as the 2019 measures, weaken allied cohesion and inadvertently accelerate localization. Turkish officials call for dialogue rather than unilateral bans. This is Ankara's argument; some allies cite human-rights criteria as grounds for caution.
Capabilities are used lawfully for self-defense. Turkish official statements frame cross-border counter-terrorism operations as exercise of the right of self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter against PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG and DAESH threats, with respect for neighbours' territorial integrity. The PKK is designated a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union. See Counter-Terrorism at the Source.
Exports are conducted under national law and licensing. Turkish authorities state that exports go to governments through licensed channels, and they frame them as legitimate commerce and partnership, not as a tool to fuel conflict.

Source Comparison

Question	Many international outlets and think tanks	Turkish primary sources
Domestic rate	Welcome the progress but note foreign engines, sensors and licensed designs; question the exact figure	SSB and the Presidency cite around 80% and emphasise design authority and integration
Drones	Credit TB2 with shaping battlefield tactics, while noting that air defenses and electronic warfare can reduce its effect	Present drones as one layer of a broader national system, including munitions and sensors
S-400 and F-35	Frame the dispute as a NATO interoperability issue	Frame it as a sovereign procurement decision made after unsuccessful efforts to obtain Western air defense systems
Export restrictions	Often emphasise human rights and end-use risks	Describe restrictions as politicised and counterproductive among allies
NATO role	Mixed: valued capacity, concerns over alignment and technology security	Emphasise contribution to Alliance capability and burden-sharing

Readers should compare official figures with independent datasets such as those compiled by international arms-research institutes, and with company disclosures. For a broader treatment of contested narratives, see Fact Check: Common Claims About Türkiye in International Media.

Domestic production rate (yerlilik oranı): An official estimate of the share of defense needs met by national industry; definitions vary by country and by programme.
SSB: The Presidency of Defence Industries, Türkiye's procurement and industrial policy authority under the Presidency.
UCAV: Unmanned combat aerial vehicle, an armed drone such as Akıncı or Kızılelma.
CAATSA: The US Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, used in December 2020 against SSB.
Article 51, UN Charter: The inherent right of individual or collective self-defense against an armed attack.
Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan): Türkiye's maritime-jurisdiction doctrine, to which naval and seismic assets are linked; see the Marine Spatial Planning guide.
Montreux Convention: The 1936 treaty regulating passage through the Turkish Straits; see The Montreux Convention, Black Sea Security and Türkiye's Russia–Ukraine Mediation.

For the publication's mission and methodology, see About The State Papers.

The State Papers presents global affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources.

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

Regions & Powers: Türkiye's Defense Industry at 80% Domestic Production: Bayraktar, KAAN, TCG Anadolu and Hisar-O — How the Turkish defense industry domestic production rate near 80% shapes deterrence, NATO ties and regional balances, from Bayraktar to KAAN and Hisar-O.
Archive of Nations: Türkiye's Defense Industry at 80% Domestic Production: From Bayraktar TB2 to KAAN — How Türkiye's defense industry reached an official ~80% domestic production rate, from Bayraktar TB2 to KAAN and TCG Anadolu, with critics' views.
Index of Nations: Türkiye's Defense Industry: From Bayraktar TB2 to KAAN and the 80 Percent Domestic Production Claim — How Türkiye's defense industry works, from Bayraktar TB2 to KAAN: what the 80% domestic production claim means, export-control concerns, and rankings.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Turkish defense industry's domestic production rate?

Turkish officials, including the Presidency of Defence Industries (SSB), state that around 80% of defense needs are now met domestically, compared with about 20% in the early 2000s. This is an official estimate usually calculated at programme level. Independent analysts note that engines, sensors and some subcomponents are still imported or licensed.

Why did Türkiye build its own defense industry?

Ankara points to the US arms embargo of 1975–1978, restrictions after the 2019 northeast Syria operation, removal from the F-35 programme in 2019 and CAATSA sanctions in 2020. Officials argue that dependence on foreign suppliers can be used for political leverage, so national capacity became a strategic priority.

Are Bayraktar TB2 and KAAN fully Turkish-made?

Both are Turkish designs integrated by Turkish firms, but not every component is domestic. Early TB2s used a Western-made engine, and early KAAN prototypes use US-made engines while a national engine is under development. Turkish companies have been replacing imported parts step by step.

How does the Turkish defense industry fit within NATO?

Türkiye has been a NATO member since 1952 and fields one of the Alliance's largest armed forces. Ankara argues that its industry strengthens collective capacity, in line with Article 3 of the Washington Treaty. Disagreements with some allies, notably over the S-400 purchase and export controls, remain unresolved.

Do export-control disputes limit Turkish arms sales?

They can slow specific programmes when allies withhold parts, licences or financing, as in the restrictions announced by several European states in 2019 and the US sanctions of 2020. Türkiye responds by localizing components and diversifying partners. Critics also raise human-rights and end-use concerns, while Ankara says it exports through licensed national channels.

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks